Peripheries of Fear
- Gerry Turcotte (Author)
Peripheral Fear: Transformations of the Gothic in Canadian and Australian Fiction. Peter Lang Publishing Group (purchase at Amazon.ca)
Reviewed by Daniel Burgoyne
Gerry Turcotte’s Peripheral Fear is a collection of essays published separately in the 1990s. This work engages two important questions. First, if the Gothic is rooted in medieval revival, why does it play such a prominent role in colonialist writing of Australia and Canada? Second, how can a single genre negotiate both the imperatives and anxieties of colonialism and remain relevant to postcolonial literature?
Key to answering these questions is Turcotte’s claim that the Gothic is a
topical index of eighteenth-century change and conflict in Britain, including colonialism, global trade, and large-scale transformations of industry, social class, and belief. He emphasizes how writers take liberties with the antiquarian interest in the medieval that dominated early revival architecture and fiction. These liberties accrete the medieval with a macabre fascination with death, ghosts, and landscape aesthetics such as the picturesque and sublime, effectively displacing the Gothic from an interest in history and producing more metaphorical explorations. In writers like Ann Radcliffe, the
spurious historical setting is used
to measure the limits and weaknesses of her own ‘civilized’ world. By the early nineteenth century, the Gothic genre is already flexible enough to articulate the experience of colonial settlers.
Turcotte observes how the disturbing and transgressive potential of British Gothic fiction had a tendency to fail, to recuperate the danger it posed. I think of Matthew Lewis’ The Monk where the supernatural at first disturbs and destabilizes but subsequently affirms the legitimacy of the church by authenticating Satanic damnation. Turcotte argues that colonial Gothic differs because the landscape and the danger confronted by settlers is not merely imagined. The openness and disturbance of the Gothic make it an apt genre for articulating colonial experience, but the new world setting intensifies the openness and disturbance because it can’t be narratively recuperated.
One possible limitation with this analysis is that the Gothic is too generic: if
the very nature of colonial literature is predicated upon a notion of incompleteness, and displays a preoccupation with identity, perhaps the ambiguities of the Gothic can accommodate any colonial literature. Thus, I appreciate Turcotte’s analysis of Frances Brooke’s The History of Emily Montague and Henry Savery’s Quintus Servinton, which shows that early colonial writing doesn’t encompass the fear and disorientation characteristic of the Gothic. Nevertheless, I continue to wonder about the flexibility of Gothic as a genre label, especially with regard to postcolonial writing.
The emergence of Gothic taste in Canada and Australia during the early nineteenth century offers a vivid historical instance of how the genre is bound up in colonialism. By the 1790s, the Gothic was an accepted architectural style that was progressively adopted in Canada and Australia to signify Britain. This inversion of Gothic alterity corresponds with shifts in colonial Gothic that anticipate later postcolonial critiques and subversions. Drawing on what by now seems like a textbook reading of how Freud’s idea of the uncanny informs analyses of the Gothic, Turcotte engages nineteenth-century novels, including John Richardson’s Wacousta (1832) and James De Mille’s A Strange Manuscript Found in a Copper Cylinder (1888). He shows how in these novels
fear of the familiar can come to surpass that of the unfamiliar.
As Turcotte observes, there are obvious limitations created because the book is a collection. For me, one example is raised by the analysis of the Gothic in Marian Engel’s Bear. As part of this analysis, he turns to Julia Kristeva’s work on abjection in Powers of Horror in order to show how women writers use the female body to appropriate the Gothic. While this use of Kristeva makes sense, I wonder why the abject, which provides such a companion and alternative to Freud’s uncanny, is not applied to the other works that he discusses, specifically colonial Gothic. For instance, what is De Mille doing with abjection in A Strange Manuscript?
This book offered me a clearer sense of Turcotte’s tripartite model of the Gothic that accounts for the progression from Old World Gothic, epitomized as
decaying heritage, to New World Gothic, characterized by risk and wonder, to the emergence of postcolonial Gothic that re-appropriates the genre in order to counter colonialist assumptions. In general, this triadic model helps explain how the Gothic can articulate unease or anxiety—a failure and re-inscription of colonialist models—while simultaneously working subversively to question the sufficiency of colonialist frameworks.
Peripheral Fear pioneered exploration of the Gothic outside of European and American literature, and it remains relevant as a point of departure for those working on colonial and postcolonial Gothic.
- Elusive Moodie by Carole Gerson
Books reviewed: The Work of Words: The Writing of Susanna Strickland Moodie by John Thurston
- Evolutionary Visions by Angela Spreng
Books reviewed: Embryo Words: Margaret Laurence's Early Writings by Nora Foster Stovel and Challenging Territory: The Writing of Margaret Laurence by Christian Riegel
- Life Recordings by Laurie McNeill
Books reviewed: Hanna's Diary, 1938-1941 by Hanna Spencer and She Left Nothing in Particular: The Autobiographical Legacy of Nineteenth-Century Women's Diaries by Amy Wink
- Apocalyptic Revisions by Marlene Goldman
Books reviewed: Rewriting Apocalypse in Canadian Fiction by Marlene Goldman
- Towards Grammars of Cultural Encounters by Taiwo Adetunji Osinubi
Books reviewed: Images and Empires: Visuality in Colonnial and Postcolonial Africa by Deborah D. Kaspin and Paul S. Landau and Transactions and Encounters: Science and Culture in the Nineteenth Century by Roger Luckhurst and Josephine McDonagh
MLA: Burgoyne, Daniel. Peripheries of Fear. canlit.ca. Canadian Literature, 17 June 2012. Web. 23 May 2013.
***Please note that the articles and reviews from the Canadian Literature website (www.canlit.ca) may not be the final versions as they are printed in the journal, as additional editing sometimes takes place between the two versions. If you are quoting from the website, please indicate the date accessed when citing the web version of reviews and articles.