Abstract: How do you read the literatures emerging from the prairies, literatures that are just as diverse and contested as the land itself? This essay offers an exploratory answer by examining the question of how prairie criticism might engage in an ethical way with the Aboriginal texts growing out of the prairies. For this purpose, I will read the work of Cree poet Louise Halfe as a performance of
mamâhtâwisiwin, before discussing how this reading may be put in relation to prairie literary studies. In its attempt to make sense of the relationship between different literary traditions, my essay relies on two critically distinct approaches—one grounded in Cree traditions of language and thought, the other based in Euro-Western literary theory. Ultimately, this essay argues for such a relational prairie criticism, a criticism that has literary critics negotiate and move between different literary and critical traditions, assuming the role of translators.
To read the full article online, visit our OJS site.
Abstract: This article examines how Hydro-Québec’s Romaine River megaproject, completed in 2023 on unceded Innu territory, brought to the surface dissonant narratives of belonging held by Québécois and Innu actors on the Quebec cultural scene. Throughout the twenty-year-long public debate over the project, a number of cultural texts emerged that reveal how hydro development, as a manifestation of Quebec’s distinctive colonialism, highlights conflicting collective identities that cohere through different attachments to land. I explore this event of extractivism through its representation in different narrative forms:
J’aime Hydro, a documentary play by Christine Beaulieu; briefs from the commission of public hearings on the environment in Ekuanitshit;
Les murailles, an autofictional novel Erika Soucy, and
Atiku utei. Le cœur du caribou, a collection of poetry by Rita Mestokosho. In gathering different kinds of cultural texts from both Innu and Québécois voices, I propose a method of “reading the river” itself through the narratives that claim it.
To read the full article online, visit our OJS site.
Abstract: In Margaret Atwood’s novel
Oryx and Crake, the apocalypse is brought about by the character Crake, who devises and unleashes a virus to wipe out human life. Far from a typical mad-scientist villain who abandons reason and turns against his own society, however, Crake exists in a social milieu that encourages the “mad” prizing of knowledge at the expense of feeling and the routine degradation and oppression of other humans. Drawing on the affect theory of Jonathan Flatley, Lauren Berlant, and Sara Ahmed, I analyze Crake as an exemplary denizen of the “happiness dystopia” that is his society. I argue that Crake’s disanthropic attitude is not recognized by other characters because the scientific and socioeconomic systems are perpetuated by a disaffected response to suffering. Crake does not appear mad, as even his genocidal endgame conforms to the affective logic of his society, effectively camouflaging his methods and motives from detection.
To read the full article online, visit our OJS site.